An analysis of data from vaccinations for 2015-16 influenza season has demonstrated complete uselessness of the live attenuated vaccines.
Аналіз результатів щеплень за 2015-16 рр. продемонстрував повну марність використання живих ослаблених вакцин проти грипу.
Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are the group of conditions with similar clinical manifestations which are caused by various viruses with tropism to the respiratory system. Without special laboratory diagnostic methods to determine the type of pathogen in infected humans is nearly impossible.
Each year from media can be heard an advice about the need of vaccination against influenza to prevent infection. But whether the influenza vaccine is really effective?
Note that the influenza virus is not the most common cause of ARI. According to epidemiological studies this pathogen is the cause of respiratory infections in near 10% of cases
Usually, in healthy human organism the influenza virus infection is self-limiting and very rarely leads to complications. But there are groups of high risk, including children, pregnant women, people with weakened immune system, for whom vaccination can be recommended before the expected seasonal outbreaks. On the world markets there are 4 types of vaccines:
Vaccine with inactivated virions consisting of whole previously inactivated ( "killed") viruses.
Inactivated vaccine with viral subunits, that contain the surface antigens of the virus.
Inactivated split virions vaccine containing surface and internal antigens.
Live attenuated vaccine containing a virus that can multiply only in the surface layers of the nasal pathways (as they are administered intranasally).
The effectiveness of vaccines against influenza is the subject for scientific debates, because unlike many others, the positive effects of vaccination against influenza is not so obvious. In addition, the effectiveness of specific vaccines varies depending from year to year. Evidence base on the effectiveness of influenza vaccines will be detailed described at one of the upcoming articles.
In a focus is an analysis of vaccination against influenza of children and adult from the US for the past influenza season
With a database of vaccination, researchers compared how many people were vaccinated over the period and had a confirmed diagnosis of influenza infection and how many people with influenza were among the unvaccinated. The results are shown in
* vaccine efficacy of 60% means that the risk of getting the influenza in those who have been vaccinated was 60% less than in the unvaccinated .
Subgroup | Number of individuals with influenza | Total | % of individuals with influenza | Efficiency, % |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
All inactivated | 357 | 1908 | 19 | 60* |
Live attenuated | 319 | 1362 | May | 23 |
|
||||
Virus type A (H1N1) | 170 | 1721 | 10 | 63 |
Virus type B | 176 | 1727 | 10 | 54 |
|
||||
Virus type A (H1N1) | 152 | 1195 | 13 | -19 |
Virus type B | 156 | 1199 | 13 | 18 |
As can be seen from the results, inactivated vaccine, indeed, was quite effective. But live attenuated vaccine was not only ineffective, but rather increased a likelihood of getting influenza.
Thus, among the vaccinated with live attenuated vaccines children (2-17 years) risk of influenza was 2.7 times higher than in unvaccinated (95% confidence interval 1.6-4.6, p <0.001).
Given these results, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (USA) recommends not to use the live attenuated influenza vaccine in the next influenza season. And these recommendations likely will be approved by the US government.
The author declare that no competing interests exist.